(Bloomberg) — Lyft Inc. accused the city of San Francisco in a lawsuit of overcharging it $100 million for taxes over five years by unfairly characterizing the compensation earned by drivers who use its app as company revenue.
Most Read from Bloomberg
The company said its hometown calculated its taxes from 2019 to 2023 based on the total amount of money that passengers paid for rides. But Lyft said that isn’t how its business model works.
“Lyft considers drivers as its customers,” the company said in the complaint filed in state court. “Accordingly, Lyft recognizes revenue from rideshare as being comprised of fees paid to Lyft by drivers, not charges paid by riders to drivers. Lyft does not treat drivers as employees for any purpose.”
The tax dispute points to a broader, yearslong controversy around how Lyft, Uber Technologies Inc. and other so-called gig economy firms rely on contractors and avoid having to provide employment benefits. The companies have collectively spent hundreds of millions of dollars to settle claims in the US and abroad that they have misclassified workers without reaching a permanent resolution.
Lyft said San Francisco’s formula for assessing payroll, gross receipts and homelessness taxes has violated the company’s constitutional rights by forcing it to pay far more than its fair share.
The city’s methodology is “distortive and will grossly overstate Lyft’s gross receipts attributable to Lyft’s business activities in the city,” the company’s lawyers wrote. They noted that the US Securities and Exchange Commission doesn’t consider driver compensation as part of Lyft’s revenue, nor is it recognized as gross income for federal and state income tax purposes.
Lyft is seeking refunds for the amounts it says it overpaid, including interest, penalties and fees.
Representatives of the San Francisco City Attorney’s office and Lyft didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
It’s not the first lawsuit faulting tax authorities for misconstruing the ride-hailing business model. Uber is challenging Georgia tax authorities over about $9 million in sales tax the company says should have been collected from drivers. The company’s arguments got a wary reception from a state appeals court panel this month.
General Motors Co. last year accused San Francisco in a lawsuit of unfairly taxing it $108 million over seven years, despite the automaker having very low sales and almost no personnel in the city. The company said the city used the presence of its Cruise self-driving unit to tie its tax bill to a portion of GM’s global revenue. The case settled for undisclosed terms in February.