Thursday, December 12, 2024

Nikolas Ibey guilty of 1st-degree murder for killing Savanna Pikuyak

Must read

A jury in Ottawa’s Superior Court has found Nikolas Ibey, 35, guilty of first-degree murder for killing his new roommate Savanna Pikuyak in September 2022.

After receiving instructions from Justice Robert Maranger on Tuesday morning, the jury deliberated for just over three hours before returning its verdict just before 4 p.m. Supporters of Pikuyak cheered and sobbed in the courtroom when the verdict was read.

Maranger called for a 45-minute recess, after which victim impact statements will be heard.

The jury’s decision hinged on the question of whether Ibey committed first- or second-degree murder when he killed his new roommate on Sept. 11, 2022.

The Crown had argued that Ibey also sexually assaulted and unlawfully detained the 22-year-old Inuk woman, elevating his offence to the more serious crime of first-degree murder.

But the defence had argued that while Ibey admitted to second-degree murder, the Crown had been unable to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the aggravating elements of sexual assault or forcible confinement — this despite police finding Pikuyak’s body splayed facedown and naked on her bed, her head tightly bound with a makeshift gag.

Savanna Pikuyak, a young Inuk woman from Nunavut, moved to Ottawa on Thursday to start a program at Algonquin College.

Savanna Pikuyak, a young Inuk woman from Nunavut, moved to Ottawa on Thursday to start a program at Algonquin College.

Pikuyak, a young Inuk woman from Nunavut, had recently arrived in Ottawa to start a program at Algonquin College in September 2022. (Geneva Pikuyak)

Crown rejected guilty plea

The trial began Nov. 13 and closing submissions were made on Monday. Ibey had initially offered to plead guilty to second-degree murder but this was rejected by prosecutors who argued that he had also sexually assaulted and unlawfully confined Pikuyak.

In his instructions to the jury on Tuesday, Maranger noted that the Crown and defence were in agreement on many elements in the case, including that Ibey had killed Pikuyak.

“This is probably why the trial was shorter than five weeks,” he said, referring to the period for which proceedings had originally been scheduled.

Pikuyak, a 22-year-old Inuk woman, had arrived in Ottawa from Sanirajak, Nunavut, just days before the killing.

She had enrolled at Algonquin College to study to become a nurse and had messaged Ibey after he listed a room for rent in the home he was living in at 34C Woodvale Green.

On the night of the killing, just days after Pikuyak moved in, Ibey went on a cocaine and drinking binge and spent hours online searching for sex, exchanging nearly 1,000 messages with sex workers, the court heard.

A sex worker testified during the trial that she had met with Ibey on the night before the killing but left after about 15 minutes because he was unable to maintain an erection.

After the sex worker left, Ibey continued searching online for sex and began scrolling photos of Pikuyak on her Facebook account.

Sometime later he went to Pikuyak’s bedroom, beat her about the head and body with a piece of wood then gagged and strangled her.

Savanna Pikuyak, right, was a good cook, according to her mother Sheba Pikuyak. Savanna is pictured here with her older sister Geneva Pikuyak. Savanna Pikuyak, right, was a good cook, according to her mother Sheba Pikuyak. Savanna is pictured here with her older sister Geneva Pikuyak.

Savanna Pikuyak, right, was a good cook, according to her mother Sheba Pikuyak. Savanna is pictured here with her older sister Geneva Pikuyak.

Supporters of Pikuyak were present in the courtroom to hear the verdict against Ibey. (Submitted by Sheba Pikuyak)

Defence presented various scenarios

Crown attorneys Michael Purcell and Sonia Beauchamp maintained that only a sexual assault could explain the condition in which Pikuyak’s body was found.

But defence lawyer Ewan Lyttle proposed several scenarios in which Ibey might have killed Pikuyak without sexually assaulting her, including that she could have been naked before he attacked her, or that they had a consensual sexual encounter that later turned violent.

In instructing the jury on how to establish whether the Crown’s case was proven beyond a reasonable doubt, Maranger said they must take all evidence into account. He noted that Pikuyak’s DNA was found on Ibey and his on her body, though he highlighted that this could have happened through non-violent contact.

Justice Maranger told the jury that if they find Ibey exually assaulted Pikuyak then he’s guilty of first-degree murder and their deliberations would be over. If they conclude he had not sexually assaulted her they must also consider whether he had unlawfully detained Pikuyak prior to her killing, Maranger instructed.

The murder of someone who has been previously deprived of liberty and subjected to the whims of the offender elevates a second-degree murder to first-degree, the judge explained.

To obtain a conviction, the Crown had to show that Ibey had murdered Savanna Pikuyak while he was committing the offence of unlawful confinement, and that the offences were two discrete acts that were part of the same chain of events.

Latest article